「知財管理」誌
「知財管理」誌 検索
| 掲載巻(発行年) / 号 / 頁 | 6巻(2006年) / 2号 / 11頁 |
| 論文区分 | 論説 |
| 論文名 | Trilateral Comparative Study of Functional Definitions for Medical Compounds−Study of patentability and validity of medical use claims defining effective ingredients by function |
| 著者 | バイオテクノロジー委員会 |
| 抄録 | Three years have passed since the publication of a report of trilateral comparative study on reach-through claims. During these three years, many examination decisions were made with regard to reach-through claims. In this connection, we conducted a comparative study on how claims for function- defined medical uses have been examined since then and discovered that the judgment on patentability differs greatly between an application claiming a publicly-known target or an active ingredient that is partially well-known or publicly-known and an application claiming both new target and function-defined medical use at the same time. |
